tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2151530911547901222.post8362067288038552023..comments2024-03-11T08:55:54.692+01:00Comments on EQE Tools: T1304/07: Appeal or re-establishment of rights?EQE Toolshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17549211485928852883noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2151530911547901222.post-78460345117429745652009-06-30T10:34:27.903+02:002009-06-30T10:34:27.903+02:00I think I found the answer myself ...
G1/90
R.8: ...I think I found the answer myself ...<br /><br />G1/90<br />R.8: The EPC does not make the time limits set by the Opposition Division for filing observations (Article 101(2) EPC, now Article 101(1) EPC2000) subject to an immediate loss of rights. The same applies to the time limit for making a statement (Article 102(3)(a), now Article 101(3)(a) EPC2000); Rule 58(4) now Rule 82 EPC2000) and to theEQE Toolshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17549211485928852883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2151530911547901222.post-60388322754868086322009-06-29T19:25:30.844+02:002009-06-29T19:25:30.844+02:00The suggestion to maybe request re-establishment s...The suggestion to maybe request re-establishment seems to overlook the fact that a condition for re-establishment is that the non-observance of the time limit must have the direct consequence of ... revocation of the patent or the loss of any other right or means of redress.<br /><br />Did the patentee lose any right as a direct consequence of not replying to the (non-received) communication fromAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07698344839151050747noreply@blogger.com